The Impact of Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Achievement
DOI: 371 Downloads 7291 Views
Author(s)
Abstract
The present study was an attempt to investigate the impact of Neuoro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) on EFL learners’ vocabulary achievement. To fulfill the purpose of this study, a group of 90 female EFL learners at Parsayan Language Institute, Tehran, Iran, were selected and 60 of them were selected based on convenient non-random sampling then a PET was administered to homogenize their level of proficiency at intermediate level. After homogenizing the sample was divided into two groups as control and experimental with 30 learners in each. Then, all of the participants in both groups took a vocabulary test as a pre-test. With a treatment process of 12 sessions, in the experimental group the teacher taught the vocabularies of the book based on swish pattern as one of neuro linguistic programming techniques. In the control group, vocabularies were taught with dictionary, synonyms and antonyms to understand the meaning of words from passages. On the thirteenth session, the participants of both groups took the vocabulary post-test to measure their achievement of vocabularies. To analyze the data, ANCOVA was run and the results showed that the experimental group outperformed the control group in vocabulary post-test. In other words, neuro linguistic programming had significant impact on EFL learners’ vocabulary achievement.
Keywords
Neurolinguistic programing, vocabulary learning, EFL
Cite this paper
AfsaneMoharamkhani, LotfollahKarimi, SeyyedDariushAhmadi,
The Impact of Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Achievement
, SCIREA Journal of Education.
Volume 1, Issue 1, December 2016 | PP. 15-36.
References
[ 1 ] | Allan, F. (2013). Training teachers in content-free NLP influencing strategies (modeled from hypnosis and family therapy) improves math attainment for adult numeracy learners. Current Research in NLP, 3(1), 6-21. |
[ 2 ] | Bandler, R. (1970). Life history of Richard Bandler. Retrieved April 17, 2014 from the World Wide Web: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Bandler |
[ 3 ] | Bandler, R. (1985). The swish. In S. Andreas, & C. Andreas (Eds.), Using your brain for a change: Neuro Linguistic Programming.Colorado, USA: Real People Press. |
[ 4 ] | Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975).Patterns in the hypnotic techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M. D. Cupertino, California: Meta Publications. |
[ 5 ] | Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975).The Structure of MagicI. Cupertino, California: Science and Behavior Books. |
[ 6 ] | Bandler, R., &Grinder, J. (1979).Frogs into princes: Neuro linguistic programming. Moab, UT: Real People Press. |
[ 7 ] | Bandler, R.,& Grinder, J. (1979).Running your own brain. In S. Andreas (Ed), Frogs intoprincess: Neuro Linguistic Programming. USA: Real People Press. |
[ 8 ] | Best, J.W.,& Khan, J. V. (2006).Research in education.USA : Pearson Education Inc. |
[ 9 ] | Cambridge English language assessment. (2014). Exam format of Cambridge English: Preliminary for schools. Retrieved December 22, (2014) from the World Wide Web: http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams/preliminary-for-schools/whats in-the-exam/ |
[ 10 ] | Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[ 11 ] | Carey, J. & Churches, R. &Huchinson, G. & Jones, J. &Tosey, P. (2010).Neuro-linguisticprogramming and learning: Teacher case studies on theimpact of NLP in education. Retrieved June 7, 2014 from the World Wide Web: http://cdn.cfbt.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/research/2010/r-neuro-linguistic programming-and-learning-full-2010.pdf |
[ 12 ] | Casale, P. (2012). Neuro linguistic programming techniques. In Neuro Linguisticprogramming secrets: Upgrade your mind with neuro linguistic programming. Creative Media NZ Ltd. |
[ 13 ] | Curtis, M., & Longo, A. (2001).Teaching vocabulary to adolescents to improve comprehension. Retrieved December 18, 2013 from the World Wide Web: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/samples/camo31/97042211.pdf |
[ 14 ] | Dilts, R., Grinder, J., Bandler, R., Bandler, L. C., &DeLozier, J. (1980).Neuro –linguistic programming: The study of the structure of subjective experience.California: Meta Publications. |
[ 15 ] | Douglas, D. (2000).Assessing language for specific purposes.Language Testing, 18(2), 133-147. |
[ 16 ] | Edge, J. 1993.Essentials of English Language Teaching.Longman: New York |
[ 17 ] | Erickson, M. H. (1954). A clinical note on indirect hypnotic therapy.Journal of Clinical and Experimetal Hypnosis.2, 171-174. |
[ 18 ] | Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes.Language Learning 46 (4), 643 – 79. |
[ 19 ] | Hawkey, R. &Milanovic, M. (2013).Cambridge English exam: The first hundred years.Cambridge: Cambridge University press. |
[ 20 ] | Khabiri, M. &Farahani, F. (2014).The comparative effect of neuro-linguistic programming(nlp), critical thinking, and a combination of both on EFL learners' readingcomprehension and vocabulary retention.InternationalJournal of LanguageLearning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 7 (4), 90-111. |
[ 21 ] | Laufer, B. (1986). Possible changes in attitude towards vocabulary acquisition research. IRAL, 24(1), 69-75. |
[ 22 ] | Lewis, B., &Pucelik, F. (1990).Magic of NLP demystified. Portland, Oregon: Metamorphous Press. |
[ 23 ] | McKeown, M. G. L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford. |
[ 24 ] | Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstracts, 13(1), 221-246. |
[ 25 ] | Meara, P. (1984). The study of lexis in interlanguage.In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A. R. P.Howatt (Eds.). Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. |
[ 26 ] | Mousavi, R. (2010). The impact of neuro linguistic programming (NLP) on orthographicmemorization (spelling).Islamic azad university, science and research branch.Iran:Tehran. |
[ 27 ] | Nation, P. (1997). Bring today's vocabulary research into tomorrow's classrooms. In G.M.Jacobs (Ed.).Language classrooms of tomorrow: Issues andresponses. Singapore: Seameo Regional Language Centre. |
[ 28 ] | Nation, I. S. P. (2001).Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. |
[ 29 ] | Nation, I. S. P. (2004).Vocabulary learning intensive reading.EA Journal, 21(2), 20-29. |
[ 30 ] | Perls, F., (1969) In and Out the Garbage Pail Lafayette, CA: Real People Press. |
[ 31 ] | Pishaghadam, R. &Shayesteh, Sh. &Shapoori, M. (2011).Validation of an NLP scale and its relationship with teacher success in high schools.Journal of Language Teaching andResearch, 2(4), 909-917. |
[ 32 ] | Robbins, S. (2008). Neuro linguistic programming research and articles.RetrivedAugest 10,2014 from the World Wide Web: http://www.steverrobbins.com/nlpschedule/random/research |
[ 33 ] | Satir, V. (1998).The New People making Mountain View, CA: Science and Behavior Books. |
[ 34 ] | Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, m. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies.Invocabulary:description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. |
[ 35 ] | Sharpley, Ch. (1987). Research findings on neuro linguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(1), 101-107. |
[ 36 ] | Shelby, M. (2010).Difficulties in vocabulary learning. Retrieved on October 21, 2014 from the World Wide Web: http://www.english-for students.com/Difficulties-in-Vocabulary-Learning.html |
[ 37 ] | West-Burnham, J. (2010). Neuro-linguistic programming and learning: teacher case studies on the impact of NLP in education. Retrieved June 7, 2014 from the World WideWeb: http://cdn.cfbt.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/research/2010/r-neuro-linguistic-programming-and-learning-full-2010.pdf |
[ 38 ] | Widdowson, H. G. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability for use.Applied Linguistics,10(1), 128-137. |
[ 39 ] | Wilkins, D. A. (1972).Linguistics in language teaching. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |